Preview

Effect of spinal extension on functional status of marine equipment operators: retrospective study

https://doi.org/10.22328/2413-5747-2025-11-4-105-115

Abstract

INTRODUCTION. Marine equipment operators are susceptible to the negative effects of prolonged sedentary work, which can strain the musculoskeletal system. This static position places constant strain on the spine, causing pain, poor posture, and reduced blood flow to the brain. To prevent and address these issues, V. S. Kostanbaev’s team developed the Gravislider-Mini device, which provides gentle spinal traction under the patient’s own weight. The device is equipped with a special carriage with a headrest, allowing for comfortable head positioning and preventing injury. Despite growing scientific interest in the positive effects of this method on the body, no specific study has been conducted on marine equipment operators. OBJECTIVE. To study the effects of spinal traction on the functional state of marine equipment operators. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A controlled, randomized study of the functional status of marine equipment operators (n = 60) was conducted. A multiparametric analysis method was used, including ECG, stabilometry, psychophysiology,   and the SAN questionnaire. Marine equipment operators worked on simulators for 4 hours and were examined after their shift and the following morning. The study group (n = 36) underwent spinal traction (Gravislider-Mini) for 30 minutes, while the control group (n = 24) did not. Statistics were processed using IBM SPSS v23 using MANCOVA and ANCOVA. The interaction of factors (“Group” × “Study Number”) and the effect of age were examined. Age-adjusted marginal means are presented. Significance criterion: p < 0.05. RESULTS. The analysis showed a significant influence of the “Group” factor on the visual analyzer (V = 0.293; F = 4.385; p < 0.001), especially in the aspects of accommodation and visual acuity (η² = 0.147–0.140; p < 0.01). “Age” turned out to be the most important factor, which explained 34.6% of the variance and negatively affected the accommodative volume and lability (r < 0; η² = 0.228–0.086; p ≤ 0.024). Statokinetic parameters depend on the “Group” factor (V = 0.224; F = 2.020; p = 0.071) mainly through body deviations in the frontal plane (F = 5.026; p = 0.029; η² = 0.084), which increase after the working day (T = 2.508; p = 0.015). Psychophysiological parameters demonstrate significant intergroup differences (V = 0.449; F = 3.749; p < 0.001), with the best parameters being observed in the spinal traction group (η² = 0.126–0.115;   p < 0.01). Heart rate variability changes significantly under the influence of the combination of study number and group (V = 0.689; F = 3.371; p < 0.001); Age plays a leading role (58.9%). Vascular system parameters weakly correlate with these factors, but small changes in the frontal rheographic index were revealed (F = 5.124; p = 0.027; η² = 0.082). DISCUSSION. The data obtained demonstrate an improvement in the functional state of the participants who underwent spinal traction: decreased tension in regulatory mechanisms, increased parasympathetic activity, reduced stress, and accelerated recovery. The control group, on the other hand, showed increased cortical arousal and impaired recovery processes after exercise. The study confirmed stabilization of physiological parameters after the procedure, improved coordination, and improved performance. These results are consistent with previous studies, emphasizing the importance of a personalized approach to fatigue prevention and improved work performance. CONCLUSION. The study demonstrated the positive impact of gentle spinal traction on the functional status of marine equipment operators. Improvements in statokinetics, brain balance, frontal cerebral blood flow, and cardiovascular parameters were noted. Multivariate statistical methods excluded age-related factors, confirming the method’s effectiveness. Based on the obtained results, spinal traction can be considered as a means of preventing the early development of degenerative diseases and improving the performance of naval personnel.

About the Authors

A. V. Sedov
Interregional Bureau of Forensic Examinations
Russian Federation

Aleksandr V. Sedov – Research Associate



K. V. Sapozhnikov
Military Medical Academy
Russian Federation

Kirill V. Sapozhnikov – Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Lecturer at the Department (Automation of Medical Service Management with Military Medical Statistics)



S. A. Parfenov
Interregional Bureau of Forensic Examinations
Russian Federation

Sergey A. Parfenov – Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Senior Research Associate



V. V. Sochenko
Interregional Bureau of Forensic Examinations
Russian Federation

Vitaly V. Sochenko – Research Associate



References

1. Ханкевич Ю. P., Седов А. В., Сапожников К. В., Белов В. Г., Ершов Е. В., Парфенов С. А. Оценка эффективности мероприятий по поддержанию функционального состояния военно-морских специалистов в ходе решения экипажем задач в море по состоянию функций центральной нервной системы //Актуальные проблемы физической и специальной подготовки силовых структур. 2016. № 1. С. 171–177 [Khankevich Yu. R., Sedov A. V., Sapozhnikov K. V., Belov V. G., Ershov E. V., Parfenov S. A. Evaluation of the effectiveness of measures to maintain the functional state of naval specialists during the solution of tasks by the crew at sea according to the state of the functions of the central nervous system. Actual problems of physical and special training of law enforcement agencies, 2016, No. 1, pp. 171–177 (In Russ.)]. ISSN 2414-0198.

2. Ханкевич Ю. Р., Сапожников К.В., Парфенов С.А., Седов А.В. Оценка эффективности гипоксических тренировок в качестве психофизиологической подготовки подводников // Морская медицина. 2016. Т. 2, № 1. С. 57–63 [Khankevich Yu. R., Sapozhnikov K. V., Parfenov S. A., Sedov A. V. Evaluation of the effectiveness of hypoxic training as a psychophysiological training for submariners. Marine medicine, 2016, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 57–63 (In Russ.)]. ISSN: 2413-5747.

3. Ханкевич. Ю. Р., Седов А. В., Сапожников К. В., Белов В. Г., Парфенов Ю. А., Ершов Е. В., Парфенов С. А. Предпосылки создания автоматизированной информационной системы «паспорт здоровья спортсмена» с поддержкой базы данных // Актуальные проблемы физической и специальной подготовки силовых структур. 2016. № 1.С. 144–149 [Khankevich Yu. R., Sedov A. V., Sapozhnikov K. V., Belov V. G., Parfenov Yu. A., Ershov E. V., Parfenov S. A. Prerequisites for the creation of an automated information system “athlete’s health passport” with database support. Actual problems of physical and special training of law enforcement agencies, 2016, No. 1, pp. 144–149 (In Russ.)]. ISSN 2414-0198.

4. Седов А. В., Моисеев Ю. Б., Ханкевич Ю. Р., Рогованов Д. Ю., Блощинский И. А., Сапожников К. В., Порожников П. А., Юрчик Н. В. Методические подходы к обоснованию номенклатуры антропометрических показателей операторов современных АСУ в интересах проектирования рабочих мест морской техники // Морская медицина. 2021. Т. 7, № 2. С. 8–14 [Sedov A. V., Moiseev Yu. B., Khankevich Yu. R., Rogovanov D. Yu., Bloshchinsky I. A., Sapozhnikov K. V., Porozhnikov P. A., Yurchik N. V. Methodological approaches to substantiating the nomenclature of anthropometric indicators of operators of modern automated control systems in the interests of designing workplaces for marine equipment // Marine medicine, 2021, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 8–14 (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.22328/2413-5747-2021-7-2-8-14. EDN UFJZMZ.

5. Костанбаев В. С., Моисеев Ю. Б. Компактные устройства вытяжения позвоночника // Главный врач Юга России. 2018. № 2 (60). С. 22–24 [Kostanbaev V. S., Moiseev Yu. B. Compact spinal traction devices. Chief Physician of the South of Russia. 2018. No. 2 (60), pp. 22–24 (In Russ.)].

6. Бадалов Н. Г., Бородулина И. В. Подводное вытяжение при дегенеративно-дистрофических заболеваниях позвоночника: достижения и противоречия (обзор литературы) // Физиотерапия, бальнеология и реабилитация. 2017. 16 (2). С. 73–79 [Badalov N. G., Borodulina I. V. Underwater traction in degenerative-dystrophic diseases of the spine: achievements and contradictions (literature review). Physiotherapy, balneology and rehabilitation, 2017, 16 (2), pp. 73–79 (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.18821/1681-3456-2017-16-2-73-79.

7. Черкасова В. Л., Матушевский П. П., Кирьяков И. М., Чебунина М. В. Вопросы кинезиотерапии и гидрокинезиотерапиив медико-психологической реабилитации летно-подъемного состава // Клиническая патофизиология. 2017. № 3. С. 73–76 [Cherkasova V. L., Matushevsky P. P., Kiryakov I. M., Chebunina M. V. Issues of kinesiotherapy and hydrokinesiotherapy and medical and psychological rehabilitation of flight personnel. Clinical pathophysiology, 2017, No. 3, pp. 73–76 (In Russ.)].

8. Гиниятуллин Н. И., Гиниятуллин М. Н., Сулейманова В. А. Подводное вытяжение как щадящий метод оздоровления позвоночника // Медицинский вестник Башкортостана. 2015. Т. 10, № 5. С. 95–96 [Giniyatullin N. I., Giniyat ullin M. N., Suleymanova V. A. Underwater stretching as a gentle method of spinal rehabilitation. Medical Bulletin of Bashkortostan, 2015, Vol. 10, No. 5, pp. 95–96 (In Russ.)].

9. Полукова М. В. Горст В. Р., Полунин И. Н., Горст Н. А. Изменение функционального состояния и вегетативного статуса человека при тракционном воздействии на позвоночник // Современные проблемы науки и образования. 2017. № 5. С. 34 [Polukova M. V., Gorst V. R., Polunin I. N., Gorst N. A. Changes in the functional state and vegetative status of a person during traction action on the spine. Modern problems of science and education, 2017, No. 5, pp. 34 (In Russ.)]. EDN ZQNFSR.

10. Маслов Н. Б., Блощинский И. А., Галушкина Е. А., Рогованов Д. Ю. Концептуальные подходы к оценке функционального состояния специалистов в процессе их профессиональной деятельности // Экология человека. 2012. № 4. С. 16–24 [Maslov, N. B., Bloshchinsky I. A., Galushkina E. A., Rogovanov D. Yr. Conceptual approaches to assessing the functional state of specialists in the process of their professional activity. Human ecology, 2012, No. 4, pp. 16–24 (In Russ.)].

11. Ушаков И. Б., Богомолов А. В., Кукушкин Ю. А. Паттерны функциональных состояний оператора. М.: Наука, 2010. 389 с. [Ushakov I. B., Bogomolov A. V., Kukushkin Yu. A. Patterns of functional states of the operator. Moscow: Nauka; 2010, 389 p. (In Russ.)].

12. Мызников И. Л., Рогованов Д. Ю., Астафьев Е. В., Пичугин В. В. Особенности самооценки состояния и приспособительных реакций у подводников на этапах длительного автономного похода // Экология человека. 2003. № 5. С. 33–35 [Myznikov I. L., Rogovanov D. Yr., Astafyev E. V., Pichugin V. V. Features of self-assessment of the condition and adaptive reactions of submariners at the stages of a long autonomous hike. Human ecology, 2003, No. 5, pp. 33–35 (In Russ.)].

13. Сапов И. А., Солодков А. С. Состояние функций организма и работоспособность моряков. Л.: Медицина; 1980. 192 с. [Sapov I. A., Solodkov A. S. The state of body functions and the working capacity of sailors. Leningrad: Medicine; 1980, 192 p. (In Russ.)].


Review

For citations:


Sedov A.V., Sapozhnikov K.V., Parfenov S.A., Sochenko V.V. Effect of spinal extension on functional status of marine equipment operators: retrospective study. Marine Medicine. 2025;11(4):105-115. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22328/2413-5747-2025-11-4-105-115

Views: 8


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2413-5747 (Print)
ISSN 2587-7828 (Online)