ANALYSIS OF THE SUBJECTIVE ASSESSMENTS OF VIABLE SHIPS CREW MEMBERS
https://doi.org/10.22328/2413-5747-2017-3-4-33-41
Abstract
The analysis of the study of the habitability of the ships of the foreign navies taking into consideration the needs of crew members serving on a contract basis. Results of approbation of the adapted method the subject an effective assessment of the conditions of shipboard life, proposed by G. L. Wilcove, M. J. Schwerin (2008). The survey anonymously polled a total of 224 member of the crews of surface ships passing a service contract. To assess the impact of mood disorders on the outcomes of the survey performed clinical screening test Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale. A significant proportion are dissatisfied with the quality of life on the ship (about 40% of the total number surveyed), which demonstrates the necessity of taking effective measures aimed at improving the working conditions of seafarers. A large number of complaints about the conditions of life demanded a detailed study of the conditions affecting crew members. It is established that the most problem are the premises of consumer services, showers, the levels of airborne noise, the ability to relax outside cabins, the adequacy of sports facilities and their equipment. Comparative analysis with the results of research in the U.S. Navy points to the similarity in the nature of dissatisfaction with the living conditions on the ship. Factor analysis allowed us to identify five factors affecting the assessment of viable ship. The results of the analysis of the survey results indicate the absence of the influence of mood disorders examined for the obtained results. Methodology for the subjective assessment of quality of life can be used in a risk-focused supervision for marine technical objects.
About the Authors
I. G. Mosyagin
Navy Headquarters of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. A. Bogdanov
Research Institute of Ship Building and Armament, Navy Academy
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
V. V. Voronov
Research Institute of Ship Building and Armament, Navy Academy
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Фисун А.Я. Состояние и перспективы развития военно-морской медицины // Военно-медицинский журнал. 2006. Т. 327, № 7. С. 89–94. [Fisun A.Yа. Sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya voenno-morskoj mediciny. Voenno-medicinskij zhurnal, 2006, Vol. 327, No. 7, рр. 89–94. (In Russ.)].
2. Schwerin M.J., Kline T.L., Olmsted M., Wilcove G.L. Validation of Navy quality of life retention models, 61st Annual Conference, Montréal, Canada. 2006. https://www.rti.org/publication/validation-navy-quality-life-retention-models. (Дата обращения 22.10.2017).
3. Pray J., Mc Sweeney K., Tomlinson C., Craig B. The human element in safe shipping: ABS initiatives // Conference on Human Factors in Ship Design and Operation. Royal Institution of Naval Architects, London, 2014. http://www.he-alert.org/filemanager/root/site_assets/standalone_article_pdfs_1220-/he01250.pdf. (Дата обращения 22.10.2017).
4. Wilcove G.L., Schwerin M.J. Shipboard habitability in the U.S. Navy. Military psychology, 2008, Vol. 20, pp. 115–133.
5. Gunderson E.K., Mc Donald W. Measurement of habitability. San Diego, California: Naval Health Research Center, 1974, 12 p.
6. Neelakanta A., Ilankumaran M., Ray S. Crew awareness as key to optimizing habitability standards onboard naval platforms: A ‘back-to-basics’ approach // Medical Journal Armed Forces India. 2016. http://www.mjafi.net/article/S0377–1237(16)30129–0/pdf. (Дата обращения 22.10.2017).
7. Guide for Crew Habitability on Ships. Houston, TX: American Bureau of Shipping, 2016. 95 p. http://www.eagle.org/property/repository/Rules&Guides/Current/102. (Дата обращения 22.10.2017).
8. Онищенко Г.Г., Зайцева Н.В., Май И.В. и др. Анализ риска здоровью в стратегии государственного социально-экономического развития. Пермь: Изд-во Перм. нац. исслед. политехн. ун-та, 2014. 738 с. [Onishchenko G.G., Zajceva N.V., Maj I.V. et al. Analiz riska zdorov’yu v strategii gosudarstvennogo social’no-ehkonomicheskogo razvitiya. Perm’: Izd-vo Perm. nac. issled. politekhn. un-ta, 2014, 738 р. (In Russ.)].
9. Щербо А.П., Мельцер А.В., Киселев А.В. Оценка риска воздействия производственных факторов на здоровье работающих. СПб.: Терция, 2005. 116 с. [Shcherbo A.P., Mel’cer A.V., Kiselev A.V. Ocenka riska vozdejstviya proizvodstvennyh faktorov na zdorov’e rabotayushchih. St. Petersburg: Terciya, 2005, 116 р. (In Russ.)].
10. Р 2.2.2006–05 Гигиена труда. Руководство по гигиенической оценке факторов рабочей среды и трудового процесса. Критерии и классификация условий труда. М.: Роспотребнадзор, 2005. 133 с. [R 2.2.2006-05 Gigiena truda. Rukovodstvo po gigienicheskoj ocenke faktorov rabochej sredy i trudovogo processa. Kriterii i klassifikaciya uslovij truda. Moscow: Rospotrebnadzor, 2005, 133 р. (In Russ.)].
11. Плахов Н.Н. Формирование жилой зоны перспективных кораблей // Морские интеллектуальные технологии. 2017. Т. 2, № 2. С. 22–29. [Plahov N.N. Formirovanie zhiloj zony perspektivnyh korablej. Morskie intellektual’nye tekhnologii, 2017, Vol. 2, No. 2, рр. 22–29. (In Russ.)].
12. Червинская К.Р., Щелкова О.Ю. Медицинская психодиагностика и инженерия знаний. М.: Изд. Центр «Академия», 2002. 624 с. [Chervinskaya K.R., Shchelkova O.Yu. Medicinskaya psihodiagnostika i inzheneriya znanij. Moscow: Izd. Centr «Akademiya», 2002, 624 р. (In Russ.)].
13. Stein N.I., Benel R.A., Malone T.B. Overview of the NAVSEA human engineering role and ship design. 19th annual technical symposium Association of scientists and engineers of the Naval Sea Systems Command, Washington, D.C., 1982, р. 30.
Review
For citations:
Mosyagin I.G., Bogdanov A.A., Voronov V.V. ANALYSIS OF THE SUBJECTIVE ASSESSMENTS OF VIABLE SHIPS CREW MEMBERS. Marine Medicine. 2017;3(4):33-41. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22328/2413-5747-2017-3-4-33-41
Views:
4
Email this article 
